Same sex wedding – Gretna Green Wedding Directory http://gretnagreenweddingdirectory.com/ Fri, 08 Oct 2021 21:19:18 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=5.8 https://gretnagreenweddingdirectory.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/icon-20.png Same sex wedding – Gretna Green Wedding Directory http://gretnagreenweddingdirectory.com/ 32 32 First look at Married at First Sight, UK’s historic same-sex marriage teases trouble at the altar https://gretnagreenweddingdirectory.com/first-look-at-married-at-first-sight-uks-historic-same-sex-marriage-teases-trouble-at-the-altar/ https://gretnagreenweddingdirectory.com/first-look-at-married-at-first-sight-uks-historic-same-sex-marriage-teases-trouble-at-the-altar/#respond Tue, 31 Aug 2021 07:00:00 +0000 https://gretnagreenweddingdirectory.com/first-look-at-married-at-first-sight-uks-historic-same-sex-marriage-teases-trouble-at-the-altar/ Married to First Sight UK gave a glimpse of her very first same-sex newlyweds, though it looks like there may already be issues for the couple. The “Social Experience” reality series sees couples paired by experts meet for the very first time on their wedding day. As they navigate married life each week, couples must […]]]>

Married to First Sight UK gave a glimpse of her very first same-sex newlyweds, though it looks like there may already be issues for the couple.

The “Social Experience” reality series sees couples paired by experts meet for the very first time on their wedding day.

As they navigate married life each week, couples must decide whether they want to continue the experience or go their separate ways.

The sixth series of Married to First Sight UK spear Monday (August 30) and is should feature the very first same sex couple in the UK version of the global franchise.

They will be presented at the show on Tuesday (August 31), but in a first glimpse of their wedding day there seems to be some brewing issues.

Daniel, 27, and Matt, 39, were featured on their ‘scary’ wedding day, but a problem appeared to arise when they noticed their 11-year age gap.

However, the two said they were thrilled to be part of the show’s first gay couple.

According to The mirror, Daniel said, “It’s amazing to be half of the first gay couple. Same-sex marriage has only recently been legalized in Northern Ireland, which is absolutely shocking.

“Now that I can share my relationship with the world, I find it so important. “

Married to First Sight UK is broadcast on E4 from Sunday to Thursday at 9 p.m.

Married to First Sight, a British expert says it is “one of the most diverse shows of the love genre”

Before the premiere of the sixth series, Married at first sight pundits Melanie Schilling and Paul C Brunson discussed the show’s diversity with Metro.

Introducing a same-sex couple, Schilling insisted that inclusiveness was “important”, and said, “It’s a big deal and I push it every season.
You are just going to love every moment of their trip.

Brunson said he thought this series of Married at first sight United Kingdom “Could be one of the most diverse shows in the love genre,” and added, “It’s incredibly diverse, and it’s a great reflection of what the world is like today. really cool!”


Source link

]]>
https://gretnagreenweddingdirectory.com/first-look-at-married-at-first-sight-uks-historic-same-sex-marriage-teases-trouble-at-the-altar/feed/ 0
U.S. Supreme Court Again Refuses To Hear Appeal From Gay Marriage Salesperson https://gretnagreenweddingdirectory.com/u-s-supreme-court-again-refuses-to-hear-appeal-from-gay-marriage-salesperson/ https://gretnagreenweddingdirectory.com/u-s-supreme-court-again-refuses-to-hear-appeal-from-gay-marriage-salesperson/#respond Tue, 24 Aug 2021 20:58:32 +0000 https://gretnagreenweddingdirectory.com/u-s-supreme-court-again-refuses-to-hear-appeal-from-gay-marriage-salesperson/ The United States Supreme Court has once again declined to hear a case regarding whether marriage vendors can refuse to provide services at same-sex marriage ceremonies based on their beliefs First Amendment religious. The case – Arlene’s Flowers Inc. v. Washington – came on appeal from the Washington Supreme Court, which upheld a lower court […]]]>

The United States Supreme Court has once again declined to hear a case regarding whether marriage vendors can refuse to provide services at same-sex marriage ceremonies based on their beliefs First Amendment religious.

The case – Arlene’s Flowers Inc. v. Washington – came on appeal from the Washington Supreme Court, which upheld a lower court ruling that a florist’s refusal to provide flowers for a same-sex marriage violated anti-discrimination law. The case began in 2013 when Robert Ingersoll and Curt Freed attempted to hire Arlene’s Flowers for their wedding after Washington State recognized the same-sex marriage in 2012. Ingersoll, who was a long-time client of the florist, was informed by flower shop owner Barronelle Stutzman that she could not provide the flowers for the wedding “because of her relationship with Jesus Christ”.

Washington State and the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) sued the florist for discrimination on behalf of Ingersoll and Freed and won at trial and again in the Washington Supreme Court. Stutzman appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court in 2019 and filed an additional brief in June 2020 following the High Court ruling in Fulton v. Philadelphia that Philadelphia had violated the First Amendment rights of a Catholic foster care agency by requiring the agency to accept same-sex couples as foster parents.

In 2018, the Supreme Court bypassed the issue of religious objections to same-sex marriage by Master Cakeshop Ltd. vs. Colorado Civil Rights Commission, where the court ruled in favor of a Christian baker who refused to provide a personalized wedding cake for a same-sex marriage. The court found that the Colorado Civil Rights Commission case against the Baker was tainted with anti-religious bias, leaving questions of religious objections and the First Amendment unanswered.

While three judges voted to hear Arlène’s flowers, that was one vote less than the total needed for the High Court to grant certiorari.


Source link

]]>
https://gretnagreenweddingdirectory.com/u-s-supreme-court-again-refuses-to-hear-appeal-from-gay-marriage-salesperson/feed/ 0
Designer loses same-sex marriage website case – Minnesota lawyer https://gretnagreenweddingdirectory.com/designer-loses-same-sex-marriage-website-case-minnesota-lawyer/ https://gretnagreenweddingdirectory.com/designer-loses-same-sex-marriage-website-case-minnesota-lawyer/#respond Mon, 02 Aug 2021 07:00:00 +0000 https://gretnagreenweddingdirectory.com/designer-loses-same-sex-marriage-website-case-minnesota-lawyer/ DENVER – A US appeals court has ruled against a web designer who did not want to create marriage websites for same-sex couples and has taken legal action to challenge Colorado’s anti-discrimination law, a Another twist in a series of nationwide court decisions about whether companies denying services to LGBTQ people amount to bias or […]]]>

DENVER – A US appeals court has ruled against a web designer who did not want to create marriage websites for same-sex couples and has taken legal action to challenge Colorado’s anti-discrimination law, a Another twist in a series of nationwide court decisions about whether companies denying services to LGBTQ people amount to bias or freedom of speech.

A three-judge panel of the 10th U.S. Court of Appeals in Denver on Monday rejected Lorie Smith’s attempt to overturn a lower court ruling dismissing her legal challenge.

The Defending Freedom Alliance, which represents Smith, argued that the law forced her to violate her Christian beliefs.

In Decision 2-1, the panel said Colorado has a compelling interest in protecting the “dignity interests” of members of marginalized groups through its law.

The anti-discrimination law is the same one at issue in the Colorado baker Jack Phillips case, which was decided in 2018 by the United States Supreme Court.

The High Court ruled that the Colorado Civil Rights Commission acted with anti-religious bias against Phillips after refusing to bake a cake for two men who were to be married. But he did not rule on the larger question of whether a company can raise religious objections to refuse to serve LGBTQ people.

The Defending Freedom Alliance, based in Scottsdale, Ariz., Also represented Phillips. Founded in 1994 by Christian leaders concerned about religious freedom, the group said it would appeal Monday’s decision.

“The government should never force creative professionals to promote a message or cause with which they disagree. It is the epitome of free speech and artistic freedom, ”group lead counsel John Bursch said in a statement.

Lambda Legal, a group that fights for the civil rights of LGBTQ people, submitted a brief supporting Colorado law.

“It’s really not about cakes, websites or flowers,” Jennifer C. Pizer, senior counsel for Lambda Legal, said in a statement. “It’s about protecting LGBTQ people and their families from slammed doors, denial of service, and public humiliation in countless places – from fertility clinics to funeral homes and everywhere in between.”

During arguments before the three-judge panel in November, Chief Justice Timothy Tymkovich asked what Smith would do if approached by a straight wedding planner asking her to set up four heterosexual marriage sites and one for a same-sex marriage. . Alliance lawyer Kristen Wagoner said Smith would not take the post.

Colorado Solicitor General Eric Olson asked if Smith should even be allowed to challenge the law since she had yet to start offering wedding websites.

But if she did, Olson said, her argument would mean she would refuse to create a website for a hypothetical same-sex couple named Alex and Taylor, but would agree to create the same for an opposite-sex couple with the same names. . He said it would be discrimination under the Colorado Anti-Discrimination Act, which prohibits discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation.

In the case of Phillips, owner of Masterpiece Cakeshop in Lakewood, Olson said the Supreme Court couldn’t agree that cakes were a form of expression. However, he said a subjective decision as to whether a company’s service amounted to speech was not a practical way to determine discrimination.

Judge Mary Beck Briscoe wrote in the majority opinion on Monday that “We must also consider the serious damage done when public housing discriminates on the basis of race, religion, sex or sexual orientation. . Combating such discrimination is, like individual autonomy, “essential” to our democratic ideals. “

In his dissent, Tymkovich wrote that “this case illustrates exactly why we have a First Amendment. Properly applied, the Constitution protects Ms. Smith from the government telling her what to say or what to do.

In 2019, a divided panel of three judges from the 8th U.S. Court of Appeals ruled in favor of two Christian filmmakers who said they shouldn’t have to make videos celebrating same-sex marriage under the law. Minnesota anti-discrimination because videos are a form of speech protected by the First Amendment.

The court restored a lawsuit brought by Carl and Angel Larsen of Telescope Media Group in St. Cloud. They are also represented by Alliance Defending Freedom.

Like this article ? Access all of our great content with a monthly subscription. Start your subscription.


Source link

]]>
https://gretnagreenweddingdirectory.com/designer-loses-same-sex-marriage-website-case-minnesota-lawyer/feed/ 0
Colorado Web Designer Who Refused To Create Gay Marriage Websites Loses Court Appeal https://gretnagreenweddingdirectory.com/colorado-web-designer-who-refused-to-create-gay-marriage-websites-loses-court-appeal/ https://gretnagreenweddingdirectory.com/colorado-web-designer-who-refused-to-create-gay-marriage-websites-loses-court-appeal/#respond Thu, 29 Jul 2021 07:00:00 +0000 https://gretnagreenweddingdirectory.com/colorado-web-designer-who-refused-to-create-gay-marriage-websites-loses-court-appeal/ By Leah Asmelash, CNN A Colorado web designer who didn’t want to build wedding websites for same-sex couples lost his appeal to the state’s anti-discrimination law. The United States Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit rejected 303 The challenge by Lorie Smith, owner of creation, of state law on constitutional grounds. The appeal decision […]]]>

By Leah Asmelash, CNN

A Colorado web designer who didn’t want to build wedding websites for same-sex couples lost his appeal to the state’s anti-discrimination law.

The United States Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit rejected 303 The challenge by Lorie Smith, owner of creation, of state law on constitutional grounds.

The appeal decision comes three years after the Supreme Court ruled in favor of a baker in the same state who refused to bake a wedding cake for a same-sex couple.

Court of Appeal Judge Mary Beck Briscoe, writing for the majority, agreed with the dissenting judge, writing “diversity of faiths and religious exercise” including Smith “enriches society” .

But the judge wrote that while Smith’s free speech and exercise rights were “compelling,” they did not override Colorado’s anti-discrimination law.

Smith was represented by the Alliance Defending Freedom, a nonprofit conservative Christian advocacy group, which argued that decision-making forces his client to post websites that violate their religious beliefs.

“The government should never force creative professionals to promote a message or cause with which they disagree. It is the epitome of free speech and artistic freedom, ”said John Bursch, senior advisor to ADF and vice president of appeal advocacy. in a report following the decision.

ADF General Counsel Kristen Wagoner, who represented Smith, said the group was considering appealing the decision to the U.S. Supreme Court.

In a statement via the ADF, Smith said she “works with everyone” but does not promote “all messages” through her designs.

“Just because artists communicate one point of view doesn’t mean they should be forced to promote an opposite point of view. The government doesn’t just tell me what I can’t say; he tells me what to say. I look forward to appealing the court’s decision and standing up for the freedom of all Americans to choose the messages they express, ”Smith said.

In his dissent, Chief Justice Timothy Tymkovich wrote that the the majority opinion “approves of substantial government interference in matters of speech, religion and conscience”.

“The Constitution does not compel Ms. Smith to compromise her beliefs or condone the government to do so,” he wrote. “In fact, this case illustrates exactly why we have a First Amendment. Properly applied, the Constitution protects Ms. Smith from the government telling her what to say or what to do.

Smith was willing to create graphics or websites for LGBTQ customers, according to opinion, but intended to decline to create wedding websites for same-sex couples, a service she planned to start offering to people in opposite-sex relationships.

Conflicts between a business owner’s religious beliefs and LGBTQ rights, related to the sale of goods and services, have been frequently debated in the courts in recent years, most notably in the Supreme Court ruling in the Masterpiece Cakeshop case v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission.

Although the court ruled in favor of the bakery, decision did not resolve broader constitutional questions on religious freedom.

Last month, a Denver district court found that Masterpiece Cakeshop owner Jack Phillips had violated state discrimination laws refusing to bake a birthday cake for a trans woman.

Since its 2018 ruling, the Supreme Court has largely avoided hearing similar cases. In 2019, the court returned a similar case, involving an Oregon bakery that refused to bake a wedding cake for a same-sex couple, to court of Appeal.

This month the Supreme Court refused to appeal from Washington state florist Barronelle Stutzman, who declined to make a flower arrangement for a same-sex couple due to religious concerns. The Washington State Supreme Court had already ruled against Stutzman in June, saying his refusal violated anti-discrimination laws.

The-CNN-Wire
™ & © 2021 Cable News Network, Inc., a WarnerMedia Company. All rights reserved.


Source link

]]>
https://gretnagreenweddingdirectory.com/colorado-web-designer-who-refused-to-create-gay-marriage-websites-loses-court-appeal/feed/ 0
Web Designer Who Refused To Create Gay Marriage Websites Loses Case https://gretnagreenweddingdirectory.com/web-designer-who-refused-to-create-gay-marriage-websites-loses-case/ https://gretnagreenweddingdirectory.com/web-designer-who-refused-to-create-gay-marriage-websites-loses-case/#respond Thu, 29 Jul 2021 07:00:00 +0000 https://gretnagreenweddingdirectory.com/web-designer-who-refused-to-create-gay-marriage-websites-loses-case/ DENVER (AP) – A US appeals court has ruled against a web designer who did not want to build marriage websites for same-sex couples and has taken legal action to challenge the anti-discrimination law of Colorado, another twist in a series of nationwide court decisions about whether companies denying services to LGBTQ people constitute bias […]]]>

DENVER (AP) – A US appeals court has ruled against a web designer who did not want to build marriage websites for same-sex couples and has taken legal action to challenge the anti-discrimination law of Colorado, another twist in a series of nationwide court decisions about whether companies denying services to LGBTQ people constitute bias or free speech.

A three-judge panel of the 10th U.S. Court of Appeals in Denver on Monday rejected Lorie Smith’s attempt to overturn a lower court ruling dismissing her legal challenge.

The Defending Freedom Alliance, which represents Smith, argued that the law forced her to violate her Christian beliefs.

In Decision 2-1, the panel said Colorado has a compelling interest in protecting the “dignity interests” of members of marginalized groups through its law.

The anti-discrimination law is the same as that at issue in the case of Colorado baker Jack Phillips which was decided in 2018 by the Supreme Court of the United States.

The High Court ruled that the Colorado Civil Rights Commission acted with anti-religious bias against Phillips after refusing to bake a cake for two men who were to be married. But he did not rule on the larger question of whether a company can raise religious objections to refuse to serve LGBTQ people.

The Defending Freedom Alliance, based in Scottsdale, Ariz., Also represented Phillips. Founded in 1994 by Christian leaders concerned about religious freedom, the group said it would appeal Monday’s decision.

“The government should never force creative professionals to promote a message or cause with which they disagree. It is the epitome of free speech and artistic freedom, ”group lead counsel John Bursch said in a statement.

Lambda Legal, a group that fights for the civil rights of LGBTQ people, submitted a brief supporting Colorado law.

“It’s really not about cakes, websites or flowers,” Jennifer C. Pizer, senior counsel for Lambda Legal, said in a statement. “It’s about protecting LGBTQ people and their families from slammed doors, denial of service, and public humiliation in countless places – from fertility clinics to funeral homes and everywhere in between.”

In arguments Before the three-judge panel in November, Chief Justice Timothy Tymkovich asked what Smith would do if approached by a straight wedding planner asking her to set up four straight marriage sites and one for a same-sex marriage. Alliance lawyer Kristen Wagoner said Smith would not take the post.

Colorado Solicitor General Eric Olson questioned whether Smith should even be allowed to challenge the law since she had yet to start offering wedding websites.

But if she did, Olson said, her argument would mean she would refuse to create a website for a hypothetical same-sex couple named Alex and Taylor, but would agree to create the same for an opposite-sex couple with the same names. . He said it would be discrimination under the Colorado Anti-Discrimination Act, which prohibits discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation.

In the case of Phillips, owner of Masterpiece Cakeshop in Lakewood, Olson said the Supreme Court couldn’t agree that cakes were a form of expression. However, he said a subjective decision as to whether a company’s service amounted to speech was not a practical way to determine discrimination.

Judge Mary Beck Briscoe wrote in the majority opinion on Monday that “We must also consider the serious damage done when public housing discriminates on the basis of race, religion, sex or sexual orientation. . Combating such discrimination is, like individual autonomy, “essential” to our democratic ideals. “

In his dissent, Tymkovich wrote that “this case illustrates exactly why we have a First Amendment. Properly applied, the Constitution protects Ms. Smith from the government telling her what to say or what to do.

In 2019, a divided panel of three judges from the 8th U.S. Court of Appeals ruled in favor of two Christian filmmakers who said they shouldn’t have to make videos celebrating same-sex marriage under the law. Minnesota anti-discrimination because videos are a form of speech protected by the First Amendment.

The court restored a lawsuit brought by Carl and Angel Larsen of Telescope Media Group in St. Cloud. They are also represented by Alliance Defending Freedom.


Source link

]]>
https://gretnagreenweddingdirectory.com/web-designer-who-refused-to-create-gay-marriage-websites-loses-case/feed/ 0
Designer Who Won’t Create Gay Marriage Websites Loses Case https://gretnagreenweddingdirectory.com/designer-who-wont-create-gay-marriage-websites-loses-case/ https://gretnagreenweddingdirectory.com/designer-who-wont-create-gay-marriage-websites-loses-case/#respond Wed, 28 Jul 2021 07:00:00 +0000 https://gretnagreenweddingdirectory.com/designer-who-wont-create-gay-marriage-websites-loses-case/ DENVER (AP) – A US appeals court has ruled against a web designer who did not want to build marriage websites for same-sex couples and has taken legal action to challenge the anti-discrimination law of Colorado, another twist in a series of nationwide court decisions about whether companies denying services to LGBTQ people constitute bias […]]]>

DENVER (AP) – A US appeals court has ruled against a web designer who did not want to build marriage websites for same-sex couples and has taken legal action to challenge the anti-discrimination law of Colorado, another twist in a series of nationwide court decisions about whether companies denying services to LGBTQ people constitute bias or free speech.

A three-judge panel of the 10th U.S. Court of Appeals in Denver on Monday rejected Lorie Smith’s attempt to overturn a lower court ruling dismissing her legal challenge.

The Defending Freedom Alliance, which represents Smith, argued that the law forced her to violate her Christian beliefs.

In Decision 2-1, the panel said Colorado has a compelling interest in protecting the “dignity interests” of members of marginalized groups through its law.

The anti-discrimination law is the same as that at issue in the case of Colorado baker Jack Phillips which was decided in 2018 by the Supreme Court of the United States.

The High Court ruled that the Colorado Civil Rights Commission acted with anti-religious bias against Phillips after refusing to bake a cake for two men who were to be married. But he did not rule on the larger question of whether a company can raise religious objections to refuse to serve LGBTQ people.

The Defending Freedom Alliance, based in Scottsdale, Ariz., Also represented Phillips. Founded in 1994 by Christian leaders concerned about religious freedom, the group said it would appeal Monday’s decision.

“The government should never force creative professionals to promote a message or cause with which they disagree. It is the epitome of free speech and artistic freedom, ”group lead counsel John Bursch said in a statement.

Lambda Legal, a group that fights for the civil rights of LGBTQ people, submitted a brief supporting Colorado law.

“It’s really not about cakes, websites or flowers,” Jennifer C. Pizer, senior counsel for Lambda Legal, said in a statement. “It’s about protecting LGBTQ people and their families from slammed doors, denial of service and public humiliation in countless places, from fertility clinics to funeral homes and everywhere in between.”

In disputes Before the three-judge panel in November, Chief Justice Timothy Tymkovich asked what Smith would do if approached by a straight wedding planner asking her to set up four straight marriage sites and one for a same-sex marriage. Alliance lawyer Kristen Wagoner said Smith would not take the post.

Colorado Solicitor General Eric Olson asked if Smith should even be allowed to challenge the law since she had yet to start offering wedding websites.

But if she did, Olson said, her argument would mean she would refuse to create a website for a hypothetical same-sex couple named Alex and Taylor, but would agree to create the same for an opposite-sex couple with the same names. . He said it would be discrimination under the Colorado Anti-Discrimination Act, which prohibits discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation.

In the case of Phillips, owner of Masterpiece Cakeshop in Lakewood, Olson said the Supreme Court couldn’t agree that cakes were a form of expression. However, he said a subjective decision as to whether a company’s service amounted to speech was not a practical way to determine discrimination.

Judge Mary Beck Briscoe wrote in the majority opinion on Monday that “We must also consider the serious damage done when public housing discriminates on the basis of race, religion, sex or sexual orientation. . Combating such discrimination is, like individual autonomy, “essential” to our democratic ideals. “

In his dissent, Tymkovich wrote that “this case illustrates exactly why we have a First Amendment. Properly applied, the Constitution protects Ms. Smith from the government telling her what to say or what to do.

In 2019, a divided panel of three judges from the 8th U.S. Court of Appeals ruled in favor of two Christian filmmakers who said they shouldn’t have to make videos celebrating same-sex marriage under the law. Minnesota anti-discrimination because videos are a form of speech protected by the First Amendment.

The court restored a lawsuit brought by Carl and Angel Larsen of Telescope Media Group in St. Cloud. They are also represented by Alliance Defending Freedom.

___

This story was first published on July 27, 2021. It was updated on July 28, 2021 to correct a judge’s name. She’s Mary Beck Briscoe, not Mark Beck Briscoe.


Source link

]]>
https://gretnagreenweddingdirectory.com/designer-who-wont-create-gay-marriage-websites-loses-case/feed/ 0
Colorado Designer Who Won’t Create Gay Marriage Websites Loses Case – The Denver Post https://gretnagreenweddingdirectory.com/colorado-designer-who-wont-create-gay-marriage-websites-loses-case-the-denver-post/ https://gretnagreenweddingdirectory.com/colorado-designer-who-wont-create-gay-marriage-websites-loses-case-the-denver-post/#respond Tue, 27 Jul 2021 07:00:00 +0000 https://gretnagreenweddingdirectory.com/colorado-designer-who-wont-create-gay-marriage-websites-loses-case-the-denver-post/ DENVER – A U.S. appeals court has ruled against a web designer who did not want to create marriage websites for same-sex couples and has taken legal action to challenge Colorado’s anti-discrimination law, a Another twist in a series of nationwide court decisions about whether companies denying services to LGBTQ people amount to bias or […]]]>

DENVER – A U.S. appeals court has ruled against a web designer who did not want to create marriage websites for same-sex couples and has taken legal action to challenge Colorado’s anti-discrimination law, a Another twist in a series of nationwide court decisions about whether companies denying services to LGBTQ people amount to bias or freedom of speech.

A three-judge panel of the 10th U.S. Court of Appeals in Denver on Monday rejected Lorie Smith’s attempt to overturn a lower court ruling dismissing her legal challenge.

The Defending Freedom Alliance, which represents Smith, argued that the law forced her to violate her Christian beliefs.

In Decision 2-1, the panel said Colorado has a compelling interest in protecting the “dignity interests” of members of marginalized groups through its law.

The anti-discrimination law is the same one at issue in the Colorado baker Jack Phillips case, which was decided in 2018 by the United States Supreme Court.

The High Court ruled that the Colorado Civil Rights Commission acted with anti-religious bias against Phillips after refusing to bake a cake for two men who were to be married. But he did not rule on the larger question of whether a company can raise religious objections to refuse to serve LGBTQ people.

The Defending Freedom Alliance, based in Scottsdale, Ariz., Also represented Phillips. Founded in 1994 by Christian leaders concerned about religious freedom, the group said it would appeal Monday’s decision.

“The government should never force creative professionals to promote a message or cause with which they disagree. It is the epitome of free speech and artistic freedom, ”group lead counsel John Bursch said in a statement.

Lambda Legal, a group that fights for the civil rights of LGBTQ people, submitted a brief supporting Colorado law.

“It’s really not about cakes, websites or flowers,” Jennifer C. Pizer, senior counsel for Lambda Legal, said in a statement. “It’s about protecting LGBTQ people and their families from slammed doors, denial of service and public humiliation in countless places – from fertility clinics to funeral homes and everywhere in between.”

During arguments before the three-judge panel in November, Chief Justice Timothy Tymkovich asked what Smith would do if approached by a straight wedding planner asking her to set up four heterosexual marriage sites and one for a same-sex marriage. . Alliance lawyer Kristen Wagoner said Smith would not take the post.

Colorado Solicitor General Eric Olson asked if Smith should even be allowed to challenge the law since she had yet to start offering wedding websites.

But if she did, Olson said, her argument would mean she would refuse to create a website for a hypothetical same-sex couple named Alex and Taylor, but would agree to create the same for an opposite-sex couple with the same names. . He said it would be discrimination under the Colorado Anti-Discrimination Act, which prohibits discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation.

In the case of Phillips, owner of Masterpiece Cakeshop in Lakewood, Olson said the Supreme Court couldn’t agree that cakes were a form of expression. However, he said a subjective decision as to whether a company’s service amounted to speech was not a practical way to determine discrimination.

Judge Mark Beck Briscoe wrote in Monday’s majority opinion that “we must also consider the serious damage done when public housing discriminates on the basis of race, religion, sex or sexual orientation. . Combating such discrimination is, like individual autonomy, “essential” to our democratic ideals. “

In his dissent, Tymkovich wrote that “this case illustrates exactly why we have a First Amendment. Properly applied, the Constitution protects Ms. Smith from the government telling her what to say or what to do.

In 2019, a divided panel of three judges from the 8th U.S. Court of Appeals ruled in favor of two Christian filmmakers who said they shouldn’t have to make videos celebrating same-sex marriage under the law. Minnesota anti-discrimination because videos are a form of speech protected by the First Amendment.

The court restored a lawsuit brought by Carl and Angel Larsen of Telescope Media Group in St. Cloud. They are also represented by Alliance Defending Freedom.


Source link

]]>
https://gretnagreenweddingdirectory.com/colorado-designer-who-wont-create-gay-marriage-websites-loses-case-the-denver-post/feed/ 0
NI diplomat homosexual ceremony seen by 20 million people after saying “No one will ever know”. https://gretnagreenweddingdirectory.com/ni-diplomat-homosexual-ceremony-seen-by-20-million-people-after-saying-no-one-will-ever-know/ https://gretnagreenweddingdirectory.com/ni-diplomat-homosexual-ceremony-seen-by-20-million-people-after-saying-no-one-will-ever-know/#respond Wed, 16 Jun 2021 07:00:00 +0000 https://gretnagreenweddingdirectory.com/ni-diplomat-homosexual-ceremony-seen-by-20-million-people-after-saying-no-one-will-ever-know/ A TRAILBLAZING diplomat from Northern Ireland recounted how his ‘low-key’ gay marriage ended up being seen by 20 MILLION people. Great pilot Brian Davidson said his father in Co Down asked ‘What are the neighbors going to think? When he revealed he was getting married to US-born Scott Chang. 7 NI diplomat Brian Davidson, right, […]]]>

A TRAILBLAZING diplomat from Northern Ireland recounted how his ‘low-key’ gay marriage ended up being seen by 20 MILLION people.

Great pilot Brian Davidson said his father in Co Down asked ‘What are the neighbors going to think? When he revealed he was getting married to US-born Scott Chang.

7

NI diplomat Brian Davidson, right, and Scott Chang with their son, EliotCredit: Brian Davidson
Proud ... Brian Davidson has been appointed the new UK Consul General in Hong Kong and Macau

7

Proud … Brian Davidson has been appointed the new UK Consul General in Hong Kong and Macau
Co Down man Brian Davidson with his three children

7

Co Down man Brian Davidson with his three children

The official told his father that the function in China was a small event and “no one will ever know”.

But the 2014 wedding, at the UK ambassador’s residence in Beijing, was the first same-sex union to take place in the country.

And when an image was uploaded, it caught the imagination of millions of people across Asia.

Mandarin speaker Brian, from Holywood, said: “I had to make a frantic phone call to my parents to warn them, ‘You’re probably going to read something in the papers. I’m sorry about that’.

‘WONDERFUL DAY’

But her parents said they were already having “a wonderful day” with neighbors who came to congratulate them.

The 56-year-old, who has just been appointed the UK’s new consul general in Hong Kong and Macau, said he was delighted with the change in law in Northern Ireland allowing same-sex couples to marry.

He admitted it had been difficult growing up in “a very conservative part of the UK”.

Brian, the current British Ambassador to Thailand, told us: “It was difficult for me to come to terms with my sexuality. It was hidden.

“I would say a lot of my friends, and probably my parents, had some ideas, but no questions were asked. Living and working abroad has made it very easy to keep this a secret.

“I only officially told my parents after I met Scott, when it was clear we wanted to get married.”

PROHIBITED IN CHINA

Same-sex marriage is banned in China, but the couple took advantage of a law change in Britain to get married on British diplomatic territory.

Today, the couple are the proud dads of three children from a surrogate mother: Eliot, five, Esme, three, and Erik, two.

Tiananmen Square, Beijing, June 1989, as an anti-government protester stands in front of tanks at the height of pro-democracy protests

7

Tiananmen Square, Beijing, June 1989, as an anti-government protester stands in front of tanks at the height of pro-democracy protestsCredit: AP: Associated press
NI diplomat Brian and family to call Hong Kong home soon

7

NI diplomat Brian and family to call Hong Kong home soonCredit: Alamy
Trailblazer Brian is looking forward to the move

7

Trailblazer Brian is looking forward to the move

All will move to Hong Kong to replace British Consul General Andrew Heyn.

It is the last stage of an extraordinary career which, between 2011 and 2015, also saw him occupy the post of Consul General in Shanghai.

And, in 1989, he was based in Beijing during the historical events in Tiananmen Square.

“A STRONG OBLIGATION ON THE UNITED KINGDOM”

Brian said: “Obviously this work is extremely important and very stimulating, but I relish the opportunity to help the UK be a force for good in the world.

“It is undeniable that there are complexities in the UK-China relationship and this work will undoubtedly bring enormous challenges as we work towards a mutually beneficial relationship.

“I started my overseas career in Beijing at the end of the 80’s, I had two other positions and I speak Mandarin, so going back to China and Hong Kong is very much like a role I have. have worked for much of my life. “

He added: “The UK has a strong obligation to defend the rights of the people of Hong Kong. We will always call behaviors where we do not agree.

“China must act in accordance with its legal obligations under the Joint Declaration and respect fundamental rights and freedoms in Hong Kong.

“I love China and I have a lot of Chinese friends. I’m basically someone who believes a relationship can work.

“MOVEMENT IS THE PERFECT CHOICE”

Brian said he was looking forward to doing Hong Kong with his family.

He said: “This is the first time we have moved with the children because they were all born in Thailand.

“Our children are at least half ethnically Chinese, so this move is the perfect choice for us as they have the opportunity to learn Chinese and get a feel for this part of their culture.

“It is always a challenge to adapt family life to my representative duties. I’m pretty strict that weekends are for family – it has to be the King, the Prime Minister, or a visiting Secretary of State to break this.

“Kids have a way of putting everything into perspective. You are the Ambassador until you walk through that door, then you are “Baba” again. They don’t really care what kind of day you’ve had. They just want you to read their story or play a game.

“Scott took surrogacy leave for our first two and I got three months off for Erik. I think I was the first man to take surrogacy leave at the Foreign Office, and certainly the first Ambassador.

“WHAT DO THE NEIGHBORS THINK? “

Brian, who is passionate about improving LGBT rights around the world, expressed his pride that Northern Ireland finally said ‘yes’ to same-sex marriage last year.

He said that for the first six years of his career at the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Department, being gay was an “offense” that could be deferred until 1991.

After years of feeling unable to talk to his parents about his sexuality, he takes pride in how the UK is now a global leader in diversity and equality.

Brian admits he was worried when his “low-key” wedding in Beijing went viral and quickly registered 20 million views on the social media platform Weibo.

He said: “When we got married, to be completely honest my dad, who absolutely adored Scott, said ‘Why do you have to get married, son?’ He said, ‘We love you and we love you. are happy for you, but what will the neighbors think? ‘.

‘THE MOST WONDERFUL DAY’

“I reassured him by saying ‘Well, don’t worry, it’s going to be very quiet, there are only 60 guests coming to China, no one will ever know, and you can go on as if nothing was’.

“Of course, I never imagined that 20 million people in China would look at my wedding photo and have it picked up by the press.

“But the day the news came out, I called my mom who said, ‘We had the best day, darling. Every five minutes someone walks by with a bouquet of flowers or a bottle of something to congratulate us ”.

He added: “As we mark the centenary of Northern Ireland, I was delighted that the country finally approved same-sex marriage last year. Our ongoing story speaks of the future of Northern Ireland for the next 100 years and this decision gives hope that we can make it the nation we want it to be.

It has been two years since anti-government protests erupted in Hong Kong, but Brian hopes his education in Northern Ireland will help him offer a new perspective to help solve problems.

Brian said: “I am very proud to be from Northern Ireland. In every article I have read, I have been explaining the intricacies of the UK and the power-sharing arrangement over and over again.

“My upbringing has given me a more personal perspective which has helped me engage with the Thais on the ongoing conflict they have at the southern borders – and I’m sure it will continue to be. useful in the future. “

For more information on Northern Ireland’s Centenary, visit ourstoryinthemaking.com/.

Happy days ... Brian with husband Scott and one of their three children

7

Happy days … Brian with husband Scott and one of their three children


Source link

]]>
https://gretnagreenweddingdirectory.com/ni-diplomat-homosexual-ceremony-seen-by-20-million-people-after-saying-no-one-will-ever-know/feed/ 0
Edmonton gay marriage video sparks conversation in Sri Lanka https://gretnagreenweddingdirectory.com/edmonton-gay-marriage-video-sparks-conversation-in-sri-lanka/ https://gretnagreenweddingdirectory.com/edmonton-gay-marriage-video-sparks-conversation-in-sri-lanka/#respond Sat, 27 Feb 2021 08:00:00 +0000 https://gretnagreenweddingdirectory.com/edmonton-gay-marriage-video-sparks-conversation-in-sri-lanka/ Video of an Edmonton couple’s wedding goes viral in Sri Lanka and sparks conversations about same-sex marriage in a country where it is still illegal. Sithara and Jenn Fernando tied the knot in October 2019 in a hybrid ceremony of Western tradition and the Poruwa ceremony, a Sinhala ritual involving the two families that takes […]]]>

Video of an Edmonton couple’s wedding goes viral in Sri Lanka and sparks conversations about same-sex marriage in a country where it is still illegal.

Sithara and Jenn Fernando tied the knot in October 2019 in a hybrid ceremony of Western tradition and the Poruwa ceremony, a Sinhala ritual involving the two families that takes place on a decorated wooden platform.

“One of the things that was really important to me, and Jenn, was basically that we wanted to show that you can be gay while celebrating your culture,” Sithara said in an interview with CBC. Active radio.

“My parents, who are immigrants who came to Canada in the 1980s …

The wedding video was posted on Youtube in November of the same year, where it has now been viewed over 600,000 times.

The video recently started making the rounds on social media after being posted to a Sinhala-language Facebook page last weekend, where it garnered nearly 7,000 shares.

Sithara said it was brought to her attention on Tuesday morning with a call from her mother. Her parents were receiving phone calls from people in Sri Lanka commenting on the marriage and congratulating them.

“[It is] pretty shocking for us, “Sithara said.” Me and Jenn, were kind of happy when the video went out and a few hundred people watched it, and then we kind of forgot about it. “

Sithara Fernando, left, wore jewelry and a sari worn by her sisters at their weddings. (Dave Brosha Photography)

The discussion on social media is more divided, with some of the nearly 5,000 comments on the post claiming that same-sex marriage is incompatible with Sri Lankan culture.

But Sithara notes that there are a lot of comments on how things should turn out.

“It’s also very encouraging to see our little wedding video starting conversations in places where we never thought those conversations could take place,” she said.

Homosexual relations are still criminalized under the Sri Lankan penal code. OutRight Action International, an international LGBTQ human rights organization, notes that although the Supreme Court condemned the laws in 2016 there has been no attempt to actually repeal them.

The couple received Facebook messages from strangers who said they never knew they could have such a marriage and told their parents about a same-sex marriage.

“We both struggled to come out of the closet, we both struggled to find people in mainstream media or fringe media who reflect who we are and be able to be that example to someone. else is a huge thing, ”says Sithara.

“I’m super happy that this has happened.”

Jenn shares this happiness.

“It was surprising to go through some of the comments and see that there was a discussion there,” she said. “A lot of people have been like, ‘Oh, I don’t know how I’m feeling exactly about this.

“But these two seem to be in love and that’s all that matters. ‘”

Jenn said it’s a conversation that’s still going on in Edmonton too, but understanding can be gained through that dialogue.

“Love is love,” she said.

“I am so happy to be surrounded by people who support me and that people can see it from all over the world.”


Source link

]]>
https://gretnagreenweddingdirectory.com/edmonton-gay-marriage-video-sparks-conversation-in-sri-lanka/feed/ 0
California woman admits threatening her school over gay marriage announcements https://gretnagreenweddingdirectory.com/california-woman-admits-threatening-her-school-over-gay-marriage-announcements/ https://gretnagreenweddingdirectory.com/california-woman-admits-threatening-her-school-over-gay-marriage-announcements/#respond Wed, 06 Jan 2021 08:00:00 +0000 https://gretnagreenweddingdirectory.com/california-woman-admits-threatening-her-school-over-gay-marriage-announcements/ A California woman admitted to threatening to bomb the nation’s oldest Catholic girls’ school – after the school’s alumni magazine said it planned to run gay marriage announcements, federal prosecutors have said. Sonia Tabizada, 36, left two threatening voicemails at Georgetown Visitation Preparatory School in Washington, DC, in May 2019 after hearing the announcements, stating […]]]>

A California woman admitted to threatening to bomb the nation’s oldest Catholic girls’ school – after the school’s alumni magazine said it planned to run gay marriage announcements, federal prosecutors have said.

Sonia Tabizada, 36, left two threatening voicemails at Georgetown Visitation Preparatory School in Washington, DC, in May 2019 after hearing the announcements, stating that “we are all children of God … worthy of respect and love”, federal prosecutors said.

Tabizada threatened to kill school officials and students in a message before calling several minutes later to say she intended to blow up the school and commit “terrorism,” according to reports. court documents.

One of them threatened to kill students if the magazine did not remove “gay mothers”, the Washington Post reported.

“The accused made violent threats against high school students, religious leaders and school officials solely on the basis of her disagreement with the application of religious doctrine by a private school,” said Eric Drieband, prosecutor deputy general of the Civil Rights Division, in a statement.

The disturbing messages came just two days after Sister Mary Berchmans Hannan, president emeritus of the school, announced the plan to announce same-sex marriage, breaking with official church teaching on the subject.

Tabizada pleaded guilty to a federal hate crime of obstructing the free exercise of religious beliefs.

She previously pleaded not guilty last January to federal charges of obstructing religious exercise by threat and transmitting bomb threats in interstate commerce, the Post said.

Tabizada, who faces up to 20 years in prison and up to $ 250,000 in fines, is expected to be sentenced on March 23.

Her lawyer, Carmen D. Hernandez, did not return a message seeking comment, NBC News reported.


Source link

]]>
https://gretnagreenweddingdirectory.com/california-woman-admits-threatening-her-school-over-gay-marriage-announcements/feed/ 0